- VTP domains
- Posted by smoove on November 4th, 2004
I have 2 6509 switches running HSRP. I want to know if they can both be VTP
Servers? they are bouth supporting the same VLAN's.
--
SMOOVE
91 GSXR 750, 96 Chevy C1500, and 94 Suburban
Hated By Many... Confronted By None!
Pain is weakness leaving the body!!!
"it's better to be judged by twelve than carried by six."
www.myhooptie.com
- Posted by Peter Davidse on November 4th, 2004
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:40:01 +0000, smoove wrote:
Hi,
There is only one VTP server in your network.
This is where you administer your VLAN's.
The other switches are either transparant or client.
Why do you need more VTP servers?
Peter Davidse
CCNA
- Posted by Freelancer on November 4th, 2004
"smoove" <reply@to_group.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
Rkxid.21$Zc5.18@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
Yes they can be both VTP servers... But when you make change to your VTP
domain you have to make this on both.
Raybones
- Posted by Freelancer on November 4th, 2004
"Peter Davidse" <untrusted@zeelandnet.nl> a écrit dans le message de news:
pan.2004.11.04.21.55.44.305999@zeelandnet.nl...
high availability.
Raybones.
- Posted by stephen on November 4th, 2004
"Peter Davidse" <untrusted@zeelandnet.nl> wrote in message
news
an.2004.11.04.21.55.44.305999@zeelandnet.nl. ..
cisco recommend 2 in their best practice doc:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/...49a4.shtml#cg1
there is a similar doc somewhere for CatOS set ups.
Regards
Stephen Hope - return address needs fewer xxs
- Posted by smoove on November 4th, 2004
Thanks for the info. Has anybody tried this on 6509's that have been
upgraded to a real IOS and not a CatOS
"Freelancer" <Freelancer@numericable.fr> wrote in message
news:418aa638$0$2128$626a14ce@news.free.fr...
- Posted by Freelancer on November 4th, 2004
"smoove" <reply@to_group.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
Vrzid.31$Zc5.5@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
Raybones
- Posted by Andrey Tarasov on November 5th, 2004
Hello, Freelancer!
You wrote on Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:59:22 +0100:
F> "smoove" <reply@to_group.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
F> Rkxid.21$Zc5.18@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
??>> I have 2 6509 switches running HSRP. I want to know if they can
??>> both be VTP Servers?
F> Yes they can be both VTP servers... But when you make change to
F> your VTP domain you have to make this on both.
Nope. It's enough to update VTP database on one server only.
With best regards,
Andrey.
- Posted by Freelancer on November 5th, 2004
"Andrey Tarasov" <andyvt@email.com> a ecrit dans le message de news:
cmel88$1878$1@news.aha.ru...
Raybones
- Posted by Steinar Haug on November 5th, 2004
["Freelancer"]
| >I have 2 6509 switches running HSRP. I want to know if they can both be VTP
| >Servers?
|
| Yes they can be both VTP servers... But when you make change to your VTP
| domain you have to make this on both.
Slight misunderstanding here. Yes, they can both be VTP servers. They
will, however, listen to updates from one another. Thus you only need
to make changes on one of them.
Cisco could definitely document this better.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
- Posted by Robert B. Phillips II on November 5th, 2004
"Freelancer" <Freelancer@numericable.fr> wrote in message news:<418aa638$0$2128$626a14ce@news.free.fr>...
Actually, I was under the impression from previous lab work that if
changes are made on one server, the server with the lower revision
number will also update with changes. At least in the more recent
code, I seem to remember this was true. Can anyone confirm or deny
this?
