Tech Support > Computer Hardware > Scanners > ot : monitor calibration
ot : monitor calibration
Posted by Jean on November 7th, 2004


In order to get "good" pictures from my scans, I'm going to break down and
get a color profile system. Which would you recommend - the Colorvision
Spyder with Photocal ($140 @ B&H) or the Monaco OPTIX ($150 @ B&H) ?

Jean

Posted by Hecate on November 8th, 2004


On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:46:32 -0500, "Jean" <Jean@spam.not> wrote:


--

Hecate - The Real One
Hecate@newsguy.com
veni, vidi, reliqui

Posted by Jean on November 8th, 2004



"Hecate" <hecate@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:mnnto05ut8qhgrh2apu3i6v22c63rdq4q4@4ax.com...
| On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:46:32 -0500, "Jean" <Jean@spam.not> wrote:
|
| >In order to get "good" pictures from my scans, I'm going to break down
and
| >get a color profile system. Which would you recommend - the Colorvision
| >Spyder with Photocal ($140 @ B&H) or the Monaco OPTIX ($150 @ B&H) ?
| >
| Gretag MacBeth - EyeOne is the cheapest monitor calibrator they have.
|
| --
|
| Hecate - The Real One
| Hecate@newsguy.com
| veni, vidi, reliqui

Which of the two I mentioned would you recommend?

Jean

Posted by Hecate on November 9th, 2004


On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 22:36:52 -0500, "Jean" <Jean@spam.not> wrote:


--

Hecate - The Real One
Hecate@newsguy.com
veni, vidi, reliqui


Posted by false_dmitrii on November 10th, 2004


"Jean" <Jean@spam.not> wrote in message news:<x8fjd.58$fe7.2279@eagle.america.net>...
Search Google Groups for "nikita eyeone" and you'll find two very
detailed answers regarding cheap profiling solutions. Should be
enough to help you make a decision. I should add that I have yet to
see a recommendation to *avoid* GretagMacbeth, even at the low
end--they seem to offer superior performance and just happen to charge
more along the way.

Also, there's now an EyeOne2 that GM is promoting for LCD use. I
don't know if it's the "best"...maybe we should wish Nikita some more
rainy weather so we can find out.

false_dmitrii

Posted by Jean on November 11th, 2004



"false_dmitrii" <false_dmitrii@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f227a615.0411101649.1ed15638@posting.google.c om...
| "Jean" <Jean@spam.not> wrote in message
news:<x8fjd.58$fe7.2279@eagle.america.net>...
| > In order to get "good" pictures from my scans, I'm going to break down
and
| > get a color profile system. Which would you recommend - the Colorvision
| > Spyder with Photocal ($140 @ B&H) or the Monaco OPTIX ($150 @ B&H) ?
| >
| > Jean
|
| Search Google Groups for "nikita eyeone" and you'll find two very
| detailed answers regarding cheap profiling solutions. Should be
| enough to help you make a decision. I should add that I have yet to
| see a recommendation to *avoid* GretagMacbeth, even at the low
| end--they seem to offer superior performance and just happen to charge
| more along the way.
|
| Also, there's now an EyeOne2 that GM is promoting for LCD use. I
| don't know if it's the "best"...maybe we should wish Nikita some more
| rainy weather so we can find out.
|
| false_dmitrii

Thanks for the reference to the previous discussions. Nikita's remarks
basically echo the results of comparisons I've found on the web. Alas, the
Gretag system is a tad out of my price range.

Jean

Posted by MPA on November 22nd, 2004


Jean wrote:

calibration of monitor/print. most effective. dont trust electronics.


Similar Posts