On 2006-07-27 11:02:07 -0700, "Don" <phoney.email@yahoo.com> said:



By checking every hour or so
I spotted the fiix on one of the Macintosh download sites, hell of way
to do business.
As far as customer support goes, I have been using VueScan for four
years and recommending it to
my students BUT I have yet to see any customer support and I have
written several times. In this case
all he needed to do was a simply one line response along the lines of,
"aware of problem, fix is in the works"
and I would have been pacified.
I will continue to recommand VueScan BUT don't expect any support.

cheers,
William

"William John Smtih" <william@greenlion.net> wrote in message
news:2006072811154850073-william@greenlionnet...
On both occasions that I have emailed Ed, I have received a reply.

Daniel

On 2006-07-28 13:15:02 -0700, "Daniel" <No_one@nowhere.net.au> said:


That is nice but It doesn't do me any good.

William

"William John Smtih" <william@greenlion.net> wrote in message
news:2006072811154850073-william@greenlionnet...
I sent him an e-mail and asked him about this. He said he checked
his records, and has never received an e-mail from
william at greenlion dot net. He said that if there was an attachment
larger than 3 MBytes, the e-mail would have never gotten
through to him (these get automatically dumped).

Don

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:52:14 GMT, William John Smtih
<william@greenlion.net> wrote:

If you are really trying to send Ed a file I can arrange a temporary
upload location for you. Also, there was a similar request recently and
someone suggested a service that will also do this.

I am hoping I haven't been baited here.

--
Steven

"William John Smtih" <william@greenlion.net> wrote in message
news:2006072817521416807-william@greenlionnet...
I got more info from Ed. He said his server logs show that you e-mailed him
on May 12, May 22, July 24, July 25 and July 27. He said that the server
logs don't contain the subject or body of the e-mails, but that none were
large e-mails. His received e-mail log doesn't have any record of having
received the July e-mails.

Did you perhaps forget to put the word "VueScan" in the subject of
these e-mails in July? He said that e-mails without this word in the
subject are filtered out as spam.

Don

William John Smtih <william@greenlion.net> wrote:

You're not alone. Vuescan has virtually no support. What's worse if
any program needed support it's Vuescan because it's so full of bugs.

When I complained to Ed he lashed out with "nobody is forcing you to
use Vuescan".

Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount lenses

"Ed Hamrick" <useless@hamstrung.com> wrote in message

SNIP
That's not real Don you're talking to right now. It's the so-called
"Don", a fake pseudonym used by a Vuescan sociopath to spread
misinformation.

It's easy to spot if you look carefully at message headers but even
just reading the content is also a dead giveaway.

For example, when you read mindless praises of Vuescan with things
like "I talked to Ed" etc, it's the fake "Don".

When you see calm, objective and constructive messages, that's the
real Don.

Bart

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:18:09 +1000, Steven Saunderson <phelum@Syd.au>
wrote:

;o)

Actually, this is no laughing matter and you have my sympathy. Their
obsession with Don is not very constructive.

Oh, well... Ed and his mouthpiece Bart just don't know when they're
beaten and keep coming back for more. Here we go again...

Don.

Somebody pretending to be "Don" <phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote:

That's a total and absolute lie!

I would never associate with criminals who fake other people's
messages.

By dragging me into your deranged fantasies you're bringing Vuescan
into disrepute and causing direct harm to my business.

If you persist I will be forced to take legal action. A few carefully
placed subpoenas will unmask your clumsy anonymity in only a few
weeks, especially when the libel has clear intent to harm a business
as you are doing.

By repeatedly claiming I support your criminal and despicable actions
you're libeling and harming my business.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick

Of course, this is another poorly written forgery from me.
Ed's postings never came from supernews, only my
postings come from supernews.

There isn't anyone here who doesn't know that this is all
a deranged game from someone who claims to only
post "objective facts" (that would be me)

Don

"Ed Hamrick" <usenet@hamrick.com> wrote in message
news:94dnc25i6n47q62mv007032hd5h2hha03i@4ax.com...

And again, this is another forged posting from me. Bart never
posts messages from supernews - only I do.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:v0jmc2pvalddbg7cal2kev24otnohgbcdg@4ax.com...

And again, this is another forged posting from me. Ralf never
posts messages from supernews - only I do.

Don

"Ralf R. Radermacher" <fotoralf@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:luimc21f4o6ubf7p1o9g6s5q8gq0qh08va@4ax.com...

Ralf R. Radermacher <fotoralf@gmx.de> wrote:

No, I didn't write this!

Regulars please note that this wanker is forging our mail addresses
again.

As announced earlier, I am not taking part in any discussion in this
group until further notice and you may safely disregard all messages on
the topic of Vuescan posted here under my name. They're all fakes.

Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount lenses

fotoralf@gmx.de wrote in message news:
luimc21f4o6ubf7p1o9g6s5q8gq0qh08va@4ax.com
SNIP
Yes, you did!

Bart

SNIP
From: fotoralf@gmx.de (Ralf R. Radermacher)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scanners
Subject: Famous last words
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:32:28 +0200
Organization: hopelessly chaotic
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <1h05xz6.1ifw9ng1p0wyi4N%fotoralf@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1122132748 01 9425 4epGJau6L3aceCJ 050723
15:32:28
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: Vg6BFrZLQeXUCX3VF22vfID+ug---gk-0Uu4i4h8XhIv3PcCpGTqgS
User-Agent: MacSOUP/D-2.6 (Mac OS X version 10.4.2)
Path:
x-privat.org!news.newsland.it!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
Xref: x-privat.org comp.periphs.scanners:141387
X-Agent-Group: comp.periphs.scanners

"Just delete it - nobody is forcing you to use it."

Ed Hamrick on my announcement that I've had enough of my life as an
eternal beta tester.

Ralf

<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:luimc21f4o6ubf7p1o9g6s5q8gq0qh08va@4ax.com...
SNIP
No, it's not!

Ed, you just can't stand that Vuescan is so full of bugs and there's
nothing you can do about it.

BTW, isn't is laudible how real Don stays above all this.

Bart

<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
94dnc25i6n47q62mv007032hd5h2hha03i@4ax.com...
SNIP
No, no, Ed, *that* is the forgery. You are desperately trying to be
like Don because you admire him so much. And I don't blame you. Don is
quite magnificent and I admire him too.

Bart

<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
v0jmc2pvalddbg7cal2kev24otnohgbcdg@4ax.com...
SNIP
Of course I do! All the time! Whenever I fake Don's messages I use
supernews.

Just like you Ed, I really I want to be like Don. Since I can't, I
forge his messages.

Bart

And anyone with half a brain can see that forged postings from
supernews are coming from me.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:ni7pc2dn2gqfmkb56ahooim1ifr8lo33ft@4ax.com...

It's quite easy to use google to see that Ed don't post
using supernews, only I do.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:qi7pc21b8aspbctenuup9s0d44s01opcoh@4ax.com...