<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
ppimc2thoc63s9e2pkodsf49tr7svpb0v8@4ax.com...
SNIP
Speaking of incompetence, the most incompetent "programmer" I have
ever seen is Ed. It seems he can't even do the simplest of things
these days.

Like faking these messages. Here's one slip-up:

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:01:16 +0200, Ed pretending to be "Don" wrote:
"From *me*"? *Me*? LOL!

You mean, from *him* (Ed). You're pretending to write this as fake
"Don", remember?

Only Ed would write: "from me"!

Bart

<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
ppimc2thoc63s9e2pkodsf49tr7svpb0v8@4ax.com...
SNIP
Speaking of incompetence, the most incompetent "programmer" I have
ever seen is Ed. It seems he can't even do the simplest of things
these days.

Like faking these messages. Here's one slip-up:

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:01:16 +0200, Ed pretending to be "Don" wrote:
"From *me*"? *Me*? LOL!

You mean, from *him* (Ed). You're pretending to write this as fake
"Don", remember?

Only Ed would write: "from me"!

Bart

This isn't very impressive. You guys apparently aren't capable of
copying each other's syntax, making this ruse pointless. Just faking
headers isn't enough.

Ed wasn't "chased away by angry Vuescan users", he despises
me and declined to have anything to do with me.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:997pc2tg0ssutcggah3ascd8emel1i8tm8@4ax.com...

It's quite easy for anyone to e-mail Mendel and ask him
by e-mail if Ed has blacklisted him. He'll admit to
anyone who asks that Ed answers all his e-mails quite
nicely and politely.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:b97pc291vvau37ehockgv4m9l9im3u7c2n@4ax.com...

Bart doesn't forge e-mails, only I do.

I regularly use phoney.email at yahoo dot com, Joe.Nanaimo at hotmail dot
com
and goldenlasky at hotmail dot com as forged identies. It's really quite
sad
and pathetic, but that's me.

Now I forge postings from Bart van der Wolf, Ed Hamrick, and
Ralf Radermacher in the mistaken impression that one of them is
actually me. Nope.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:d97pc2pvc0l1u82hgn62aegb746j9fj435@4ax.com...

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:f97pc2h0etrleb0k5lglfg5drivf8ao32j@4ax.com...
No, Ed never "exploded with obscenities" - he only called me an
obnoxious, ignorant asshole. Anyone reading this thread would agree.

Don

There was no slip-up - I'm just an asshole responding
to my own forged postings. Is anyone even interested
in my rantings any more?

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:l97pc2tt50j7kg220n3a53e5kj5ue8jaj1@4ax.com...

Yes, Ed Hamrick has one of the most-downloaded
applications on versiontracker.com (more than a million downloads),
has won awards from MacWorld, and keeps getting excellent
magazine reviews.

You can download his excellent VueScan application from:

http://www.hamrick.com/

I recommend it wholeheartedly.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote in message
news:088pc2d2fbt868vbqad6vt241tk96eibu6@4ax.com...

On 30 Jul 2006 12:08:38 -0700, "Roger S." <rsmith02@gmail.com> wrote:

I couldn't agree more, Roger. But apparently Ed and Bart are out of
control. After all, it was them who started all this faking and now
that they dug a hole they don't know how to get out of it but just
continue to make matter worse.

It also speaks volumes that Ed would participate in such nonsense,
either directly (by faking messages) or indirectly (by, allegedly,
providing his server log information, etc).

This makes Ed criminally liable and it ties his hands. That, together
with the fact they started this message faking in the first place,
closes all legal avenues for them since going after Don's real
identity would also expose their's, as well as Ed's support.

Not to mention Don never did anything wrong! He only stated a few
simple, objective facts.

So, they lost before all this even began. And they're just making
things worse for themselves by being out of control.

Don.

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:06:04 +0200, "Bart van der Wolf"
<bvdwolf@xs4all.nl> wrote:

We never were, Bart.

Don.

<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:l97pc2tt50j7kg220n3a53e5kj5ue8jaj1@4ax.com...
SNIP
Not to change the subject but I found another major bug in Vuescan. It
doesn't even start anymore but crashes my whole system!?

I'm afraid to run it again because I fear it will wipe out my hard
disk. What's going on with Vuescan?

Bart

<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:l97pc2tt50j7kg220n3a53e5kj5ue8jaj1@4ax.com...
SNIP
That's correct. Vuescan is not a serious program. As Don says it's
riddled with bugs. I'll append a short assortment.

As you can see there I myself have complained many times.

Bart



SNIP
On 2 Apr 2004 15:24:58 -0800, mailing@numerixtechnology.de (Elisabeth
Schmitz) wrote:

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:07:15 +0200, "Bart van der Wolf"
<bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:47:01 +0200, "Bart van der Wolf"
<bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 14:48:48 -0500, Alex Stols <alex_stols@xs4all.nl>
wrote:

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:51:50 -0500, "Matthew Dranchak"
<mdranch@snip.net> wrote:

On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 04:39:56 -0600, Alex Stols <Alex Stols> wrote:

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 09:58:09 +0200, "Jouko Vierumäki"
On 4 Jan 2005 18:25:16 -0800, mendel_leisknospam@hotmail.com wrote:

On 17 Jan 2005 18:44:05 -0800, mendel_leisknospam@hotmail.com wrote:

On 18 Feb 2005 18:00:06 -0800, Joe_Nanaimo@hotmail.com wrote:

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:37:58 -0800, Andrey Tarasevich
<andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 4 Apr 2005 15:03:19 -0700, "pahtspix" <pahts@comcast.net> wrote:

On Tue, 03 May 2005 22:05:15 -0700, Andrey Tarasevich
<andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:59:50 +0100, "John" <warthog@nospam.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

On 10 Aug 2005 05:55:19 -0700, "Mendel Leisk"
<mendel_leisknospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:27:07 +0100, "John"
<warthog@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:

On 10 Aug 2005 19:27:37 -0700, "Mendel Leisk"
<mendel_leisknospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 12 Oct 2005 19:40:18 -0700, "DenverDad"
<the_applegates@comcast.net> wrote:

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:20:48 +0100, "Bart van der Wolf"
<bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote:

On 3 Dec 2005 07:51:48 -0800, "Djon" <jtk@channelsynergy.com> wrote:

On 12 Dec 2005 16:04:52 -0800, "Roger S." <rsmith02@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:08:59 GMT, "Maris V. Lidaka Sr."
<nemlidaka@ameritech.net> wrote:

On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:44:33 -0500, Robert Feinman
<robert.feinman@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:21:57 +0000, John <"john at osmium dot plus dot
net"> wrote:

On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:37:44 +0100, "M. Zwierzycki"
<zwier@pcand10.mpi-stuttgart.mpg.de> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:27:58 -0800, "Andy Salnikov"
<a_salnikov@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:28:02 GMT, theo <hazel_iz@earthlink.net> wrote:

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:32:00 GMT, Tom <tvanderpool@juno.com> wrote:

On 6 Mar 2006 19:02:16 -0800, "TDMedia" <TDMedia@optonline.net> wrote:

Subject: Re: VueScan stopped working as soon as I paid the $50!!!!

On 26 Mar 2006 09:22:34 -0800, "Mendel Leisk"
<mendel_leisknospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 27 Mar 2006 15:28:06 -0800, "DenverDad"
<the_applegates@comcast.net> wrote:

On 27 Mar 2006 15:38:52 -0800, "Roger S." <rsmith02@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:12:05 +0200, Olaf <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:34:28 +0200, Olaf <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:28:54 GMT, William John Smith
<william@greenlion.net> wrote:

<useless@hamstrung.com> wrote in message
newspimc2thoc63s9e2pkodsf49tr7svpb0v8@4ax.com...
SNIP
Indeed. Ed has a legendary temper. Since he was unable to fix the many
Vuescan bugs he ran away in shame as can be seen here:

SNIP
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:29:00 -0700, "Ed Hamrick" <usenet@hamrick.com>
wrote:


Bart

<useless@hamstrung.com> wrote in message
news:d97pc2pvc0l1u82hgn62aegb746j9fj435@4ax.com...
SNIP
That's right! Ed actively supports all this by providing me with his
server logs.

The trouble is no matter what we do Don always comes out on top.

It's infuriating.

And all along he stays so calm! Maybe because he has nothing to lose,
while we have staked our reputation when we started all this.

Not much left of our reputation now, though... :-(

Bart

<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b97pc291vvau37ehockgv4m9l9im3u7c2n@4ax.com...
SNIP
Correct. Don't forget to ask Mendel why he wrote this:

SNIP

Bart

<phoney.email@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:997pc2tg0ssutcggah3ascd8emel1i8tm8@4ax.com...
SNIP
Yes, he was. From the horse's mouth (Ed. Horse's mouth. Geddit? :-)
No? Oh well, you have to be of certain age.) Anyway:

SNIP
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:29:00 -0700, "Ed Hamrick"
<usenet@hamrick.com> wrote:


Don (the real one) never owned a Minolta.

Actually he loves you (the fake Don). That's why he, allegedly, gives
you his server logs when he's not faking messages himself.

But Ed does despise the real Don ever since he calmly proved to Ed why
individual RGB Analog Gain was essential.

After insisting for years individual RGB was not needed, Ed had no
choice but to implement it after Don, the real one, proved the need
for it beyond any doubt.

Prior to that I have sheepishly been asking Ed for individual RGB for
years, but he would just snarl "You don't need that". Don proved you
do need it, and Ed has hated him ever since.

Bart

Hey, Real Don,
Since you never take part in flame-wars and ad-hominems, will you agree
to unilaterally stop feeding the other trolls by posting under fake
names? The S/N ratio of this site is plummeting. It doesn't matter
who started it.

Bart van der Wolf wrote:

And again, another boring forged e-mail from me.
It's from supernews, and Bart doesn't post from
supernews.

There are thousands of people who download
VueScan every day (look at the versiontracker
statistics) and people are very happy with it.

Use www.google.com to search for VueScan
and you'll find lots of happy users.

It's an excellent application, and you can
download it from:

http://www.hamrick.com/

I recommend it wholeheartedly.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:gj7sc2dcjnm4p2e7s6lnfo54tn9k9r0bml@4ax.com...

And again, another boring forged e-mail from me.
It's from supernews, and Bart doesn't post from
supernews.

There are thousands of people who download
VueScan every day (look at the versiontracker
statistics) and people are very happy with it.

Use www.google.com to search for VueScan
and you'll find lots of happy users.

It's an excellent application, and you can
download it from:

http://www.hamrick.com/

I recommend it wholeheartedly.

Don

"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:0k7sc2pbb5tg1knj342rr1avrq8gqssaom@4ax.com...