- Artificial intelligence (AI) has been solved
- Posted by Laurent Bossavit on August 17th, 2003
If it has, why isn't it telling us itself ?
- Posted by Arthur T. Murray on August 17th, 2003
<PRE>
________ ________
/ \ / \
( Motorium ) ______ ( Security )
________ \________/\ / \ /\________/ _________
/ \ \/ main \/ / \
( Volition )-----------( Alife )----------( Sensorium )
\________/ ________ /\ loop /\ _______ \_________/
/ \/ \______/ \/ \
( Think ) ( Emotion )
\________/ \_______/
</PRE>
Artificial intelligence (AI) has arguably been solved in
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/theory5.html theory and
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/jsaimind.html software.
Do-It-Yourself Artificial Intelligence is described at
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/acm.html -- DIY AI.
One language which needs native AI Mind coding is
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/apl.html -- APL.
Please code and release here a freeware version of the main
http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/alife.html -- AI mind loop.
- Posted by John Corliss on August 18th, 2003
Laurent Bossavit wrote:
Are you sure that it isn't? 80)>
A team of 50 world class computer scientists decided that they'd
connect 200 of the world's fastest computers to see what would happen.
After a lot of work, they succeeded in accomplishing the task. With
anxious fingers, one of them sat down at the keyboard and typed:
"Is there a God?"
The answer immediately came back:
"There is now."
--
Regards from John Corliss
alt.comp.freeware F.A.Q.:
http://www.ccountry.net/~jcorliss/F.A.Q./FrameSet1.html
- Posted by OldAmigaBoy on August 18th, 2003
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:33:55 +0200, Laurent Bossavit
<laurent.ng@bossavit.com> wrote:
Someone once said something like that true articicial intelligence
would be when a group of experts conversed with an AI and humans (over
a computer so could not tell by looking at it/him/her!) and could not
tell the difference.
Maybe uj797@victoria.tc.ca (alias Arthur T. Murray)who originated this
thread) is such an AI!!
- Posted by PeeJay on August 18th, 2003
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:29:42 +1000, OldAmigaBoy
<oldamigaboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Gee - and here's me thinking I was in touch with a human!!
- Posted by Steve Jorgensen on August 18th, 2003
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:29:42 +1000, OldAmigaBoy <oldamigaboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
It was Alan Turing, and it's called the "Turing Test".
- Posted by Steve Zimmerman on August 18th, 2003
OldAmigaBoy wrote:
/* A-I informs us that it has been solved. */
int main()
{
printf("A-I has been solved\n");
return 0;
}
- Posted by gregm@cs.uwa.edu.au on August 18th, 2003
In comp.lang.misc Steve Zimmerman <stevetux@sonic.net> wrote:
: OldAmigaBoy wrote:
:> Arthur T. Murray wrote:
:>>Artificial intelligence (AI) has arguably been solved
:> Someone once said something like that true articicial intelligence
:> would be when a group of experts conversed with an AI and humans (over
:> a computer so could not tell by looking at it/him/her!) and could not
:> tell the difference.
: int main()
: {
: printf("A-I has been solved\n");
:
: return 0;
: }
Well I sure can't tell the difference between this program and Arthur.
Case closed.
-Greg
- Posted by Mel on August 18th, 2003
"OldAmigaBoy" <oldamigaboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:kqh0kvkc8br8jhue8e25sielvl4lepiklf@4ax.com...
I remember hearing that one group actually did test their AI software
by setting it up to post in various Usenet newsgroups...
Regards,
Mel.
- Posted by DONALD G. DAVIS on August 18th, 2003
"Mel" <newsgroup.for.spammel@spamgourmet.com> writes:
Wouldn't work--it would be *too smart* to pass for the average
level of discourse in many newsgroups... ;-)
--Donald Davis
- Posted by Dale King on August 22nd, 2003
"Steve Jorgensen" <nospam@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:fvk0kvo6bi9g96uc97n8lrrecvn9e09ijc@4ax.com...
If anyone wants to read more on the subject you can read the paper here
http://www.abelard.org/turpap/turpap.htm
--
Dale King
- Posted by Randall S. Becker on August 26th, 2003
"Steve Zimmerman" <stevetux@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:3F406156.4000000@sonic.net...
| OldAmigaBoy wrote:
|
| > On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:33:55 +0200, Laurent Bossavit
| > <laurent.ng@bossavit.com> wrote:
| >
| >
| >>>Artificial intelligence (AI) has arguably been solved
| >>>
| #include <stdio.h>
|
| /* A-I informs us that it has been solved. */
| int main()
| {
| printf("A-I has been solved\n");
|
| return 0;
| }
How about this?
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
printf("Eliza: What makes you say that %s?\n", argv[1]);
return 0;
}
Of course, if you run it without arguments, the results are indeterminate,
as with a person. ;-)
- Posted by Arthur J. O'Dwyer on August 27th, 2003
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Phlip wrote:
Just goes to show. If you make a statement without an argument,
you get indeterminate results. Hence, I must supply the missing
argument:
The Standard (N869, actually) explicitly says that argv[argc]
shall be a null pointer. argv[1] is thus equal to NULL for
argc==1, and undefined for argc==0. Neither of these is related
in any way (save type) to the empty string "".
There's your argument. Now can we get some defined results?
And maybe a little less random cross-posting?
-Arthur
