Wow and wow again. ACF looks like it's Hummingbird's own private group
where almost every post seems is by him.

It looks like the OK Corral in some threads here. Assuming the
date/times are for real then there's tons to plow through in
chronological order and see what happened on what thread and who did what
next and why.

Could someone who might have followed this give a simple explaination how
it started and what happened?

Did someone reveal some hot info about Hummingbird?

I actually predicted Hummingbird sounded he was losing his head fast and
sounding more deperate and lunatic than usual and even archived his more
extreme sounding posts. (See links below.)

Hummingird claimed he offered me ceasefire deals but his posts had so
many barbed statements and repeated the usual false claims that it all
loked as double dealing as ever. But he did sound as if he was ready to
go over the edge and might do anything. I guessed a sporge attack on
alt.comp.freeware and uk.politics.misc to swamp posts which said anything
about him. But this is something else.

Background info, anyone?

Franklin



--------- START OF HUMMINGBIRD ON THE EDGE ---------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...5c6c0678edf0fd
news:Xns9AD2E884393BB8D91A@127.0.0.1

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...20d33cea371ac3
news:Xns9AD2E6A5C8C968D91A@127.0.0.1

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...a664120a726d09
news:Xns9AD2E8A994D188D91A@127.0.0.1

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...2adc7f4c38fe4a
news:Xns9AD2E61C6A0BC8D91A@127.0.0.1

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...318569e0957c5b
news:Xns9AD2E7F8158608D91A@127.0.0.1

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...ac87131907c234
news:g4ousi.3eg.1@localhost.127.0.0.1

--------- END OF HUMMINGBIRD ON THE EDGE ---------

Franklin <never.t@sted.it> wrote in news:Xns9AD4B9AEA4C0A8D91A@127.0.0.1:

And I notice that you have once again nymshifted to get out of killfiles.

On 7 Jul 2008 17:48:50 GMT 'elaich'
wrote this on alt.comp.freeware:


Not to mention that Franklin is responsible for a lot of the posts
using my name over the past few days.


--
"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

"Franklin" <never.t@sted.it> wrote in message
news:Xns9AD4B9AEA4C0A8D91A@127.0.0.1...

Franklin wrote:
How about this for starters:

You're the personification of pure evil.

And, you're not fooling anyone.

On Mon 07 Jul 2008 18:48:50, elaich wrote:

Hello Eliach,

I don't know if you are particularly new to killfiles or maybe just
struggling on what to killfile on but I can offer you some good friendly
advice.

Franklin's the name and matching on "Franklin" will help you killfile me.
Only the Good Lord knows what the hell you are killfiling on if it isn't
my name.

I don't use a killfile myself but dspite that I can still manage to tell
you to use my name. How is it an otherwise intelligent person like you
can't manage to work it out?

Sure, it doesn't work 100% of the time but that's life. It will work
something like 98% of the time and I imagine you are not so obsessional
that you make demands for the other dwindling percentage too.

Now, Eliach, come closer and I will explain something else to you. If
you use my dummy email address then you will have ordinary people think
you are very naive indeed if you believe that address will never change.
In fact, if you are observant and not just another moaner about my
headers then you will notice how I am cycling through various senses in
my email address (see, hear, taste, etc).

Why? Because I am playful that way and anyway I have no duty to anyone
to retain my return address if I don't like it. Maybe next I will go
thru the colors of the rainbow. Or the notes of the G-major scale. Or
the players in a football team or whatever I choose to use, I'm sorry to
say it but I won't be asking for your permission and I am sure you will
understand that.

You would do well not to think you have a right to coerce people with
regard to how they jazz up their headers.

"Franklin" <never.t@sted.it> wrote in message
news:Xns9AD4ECEA069D8D91A@127.0.0.1...
Pure self-justification.

I see the truce appears to have been effectively trashed, mainly by two
people. Nice.

On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:48:56 GMT 'bud'
wrote this on alt.comp.freeware:

Franklin is so fond of me that he even posts using my posting name
.... and then starts this thread to distract attention away from
what he's done. When I post on other groups, he even follows me
around and tries to lure me into debate with him.

Some might call his interest in me an 'unnatural obsession'.


--
"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

In article <Xns9AD4ED442E6838D91A@127.0.0.1>, Franklin <never.t@sted.it>
writes
Ah, how romantic. It quite takes my mind off the drudgery of freeware.
--
Roger Hunt

humming.bird <humming.bird@127.0.0.1> wrote in news:g4tspu.31k.1
@localhost.127.0.0.1:

And so have you. You're both well bolted in now.

On Mon 07 Jul 2008 23:05:19, Stephen Thomas wrote:


Hello Stephen,

Lovely to see you, you naughty little troll.

Have you got any new Tamla Motown lyrics? It's interesting how some
people listen to the lyrics in a song and latch onto them really very
strongly whereas others are not even aware of what the lyrics are but
like the music. Of course some songs are an exception like Band of
Gold whose lyrics you can't miss.

You get some people who might refer another to a song because the
lyrical content has such a great meaning for them.

In general I tended to find that most of Tamla Motown's lyrics were a
bit "mushy" and that Tamla's music (not to everyone's taste) was the
main driver.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKaNM3YgC-0

So have you got any interesting Tamla Motown lyrics for me these days?
Do you think we should include Stax just to widen the selection a bit?

On Mon 07 Jul 2008 23:42:22, Roger Hunt wrote:



This combines the two: http://www.justpip.com/lovecalculator.htm

"Love Is Freeware" at: http://allone.com/LoveV4.0.s

In article <Xns9AD53137233B8D91A@127.0.0.1>, Franklin <never.t@sted.it>
writes
requires .net 2.0. I bit back my revulsion and so .net 2.0 is marching
down the wire as I type.
Oh bloody H it wants to reboot now and I've got to shut down the 73
programmes I've got open. Bah!
That is very very good indeed. Most definitely saved. Thanks.
--
Roger Hunt

On 7 Jul 2008 22:50:46 GMT 'elaich'
wrote this on alt.comp.freeware:

"so have you" what vacuum cleaner? We are talking about the
abundance of forgery posts on ACF over the past few days in
MY name. Are you suggesting I forge my own posts?
ROTFL.


--
"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:41:02 -0700 'Mister Charlie'
wrote this on alt.comp.freeware:



I'm not too sure what you mean Mister Charlie, but I can assure
you that some of the forgeries on ACF over the past few days in
MY name have been posted by Franklin. He started this thread for
no other purpose than to play the innocent bystander and divert
attention away from his forgery activity after I called him out
on it.


--
"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
(Arthur Schopenhauer)

On Jul 7, 1:48*pm, elaich <x...@y.z> wrote:
Above post is a forgery and was not posted by me (elaich)
....although I agree that Franklin is a criminal.

--
"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
(Arthur Schopenhauer)