Tech Support > Computer Hardware > Storage Devices > 80 pin to 68 pin converter question
80 pin to 68 pin converter question
Posted by Chris on January 12th, 2008


Hello all,

I built a new computer (for home use) and I wanted really fast drives
so I bought 15K RPM Ultra 320 SCSI drives
Hitachi Ultrastar HUS153014VL3800 and FUJITSU Enterprise MAU3073NC
and
I bought a Adaptec SCSI Card 39320D. I didnt realize at the time that
the drives were 80 pin.
So I couldnt use them at the time I got together the rest of my parts
so I just threw in a IDE drive till I get this all sorted out and I
need some advise.
So I understand I need a 80 pin to 68 pin converter to make these
drives usefull to me I guess. From what I have researched so far I
found that I cant find a 80 pin SCSI cable and 80 pin SCSI controller
card.
So I guess my main question is.... Am I better off just buying SATA
drives or will these drives still out perform SATA drives even
thought
they will have to be connected via a 80 to 68 pin converter.


Thanks,
Chris

Posted by CJT on January 12th, 2008


Chris wrote:
80 pin is intended to mate with a backplane. Adapters are available.
80 pin is essentially 68 pin plus a few extra for power.

You'd have to define "better off" to get a good answer to your question.
The adapter should have no effect on the drive's speed.

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.

Posted by Eric Gisin on January 12th, 2008


Do not post multiple messages to different groups.
A recent 15K SCSI drive will outperform any 7200 SATA drive.

"Chris" <chris.holub@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2e414e42-5010-4cb2-94c1-c534141f817a@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...

Posted by Chris on January 12th, 2008


On Jan 12, 3:26*pm, "Eric Gisin" <gi...@uniserve.com> wrote:
Sorry Eric,
I know better I just didnt know how active these gruops are and I
wanted a answer quick. Plus not all are part of both groups.

Thanks for the info though..

Cheers,
Chris

Posted by Chris on January 12th, 2008


On Jan 12, 10:23*am, CJT <abujl...@prodigy.net> wrote:
Yeah Im just talking performance. is converting it making it lose any
of its read time, seek time, throughput, etc...

Chris

Posted by Folkert Rienstra on January 16th, 2008


Chris wrote in
news:5b67093d-c839-41eb-8496-12804d5cf79d@i72g2000hsd.googlegroups.com
Like it makes a difference.

Plus not all what?


Similar Posts