- Most reliable drives in peoples experience??
- Posted by Smurfinaus on November 30th, 2003
Hi All,
I suspect its time for me to get a new HD. The IBM 40Gb ive had last two
years has been great but some bad sectors have been cropping up so im
looking for a new drive. Previously i had Fujitsu 6.4 and 4.3 and both
worked fine. Havent kept up with drive technology lately (nor CPU or
Motherboards - gee i need new ones soon too..) so may i ask, in peoples
experience what brand drives are reliable ?. Ive heard bad things about
certain IBM ones, but Seagates are good?.
thanks in advance for any advice
Nijuu.
- Posted by Will Dormann on December 1st, 2003
Smurfinaus wrote:
I like Seagate. I don't like Maxtor.
Just a personal opinion, and that's all.
-WD
- Posted by Rod Speed on December 1st, 2003
Smurfinaus <smurfinaus@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message news:Xns94447B67CC42smurfinausinternodeo@203.16.21 4.244...
I like Intel cpus and Asus motherboards with Intel chipsets myself.
And the Fujitsu MPG drives too. Not relevant
now tho, Fujitsu has given up on 3.5" IDE drives.
Not necessarily. Nothing like as bad as the
IBM GXP drives, but I avoid them myself.
I like the Samsung P80 drives currently and they are the
last of the drive manufacturers to have full 3 year warrantys
on all their drives. Beautifully quiet too which is a real bonus.
- Posted by Mr. Grinch on December 1st, 2003
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:bqebs8$21c050$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de:
While I would be happy to try their 160GB drives, I was wishing they had
something in the 300GB range, but they don't have anything bigger, not even
in 5400rpm.
160GB drives have been out for ages, almost a year, it sure seems to take a
long time for bigger sizes in the drive industry.
- Posted by DaveL on December 1st, 2003
I just got one of those Samsungs. It is very thin and very quiet. It does
seem to run hot. Could be bad for long term durability. We'll see, I
guess.
Dave
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bqebs8$21c050$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de...
- Posted by Papa on December 1st, 2003
You will probably get as many opinions as responses, and that is all they
are - opinions. My preference is Western Digital, for the simple reason that
I've never had a failure with them.
"Smurfinaus" <smurfinaus@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94447B67CC42smurfinausinternodeo@203.16.21 4.244...
- Posted by John on December 2nd, 2003
If you've got a good backup system in place, try using the IBM drive fitness
test to reformat that whole drive, then run the "thorough surface test"
option on it to make sure there are no longer any bad sectors. It'll
probably be right again for a couple of years.
"Smurfinaus" <smurfinaus@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94447B67CC42smurfinausinternodeo@203.16.21 4.244...
- Posted by Cheah TE on December 6th, 2003
| > Seagates are good?.
I know 1 Seagate hdd bought in 4-95, & it still works. I'd avoid
Quantum ; their ICs fail with any slight voltage spikes, I have 3
dead Quantum hdds.
Mitsubishi makes very good & small surge absorbers, hdd
makers should fit these onto their PCBs to block voltage
spikes.
- Posted by Q on December 9th, 2003
Dave Glass wrote:
No... Maxtor
- Posted by J.Clarke on December 10th, 2003
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:59:00 GMT
Michael Cecil <macecil@comcast.net> wrote:
Nope, it is incentive for the drive manufacturer to charge a higher
price. Or do you really think that the cost of warranty repairs comes
out of the manufacturer's pocket?
--
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
- Posted by Rod Speed on December 10th, 2003
Dave Glass <dave@here.invalid> wrote in message
news:f7rctvkj6ql68u67cv45tf39rj0qv3p9i1@4ax.com...
Correct.
You're wrong again. Maxtor.
- Posted by Scott Alfter on December 10th, 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <f7rctvkj6ql68u67cv45tf39rj0qv3p9i1@4ax.com>,
Dave Glass <dave@here.invalid> wrote:
It's worse than that...Quantum was bought out by Maxtor. :-P
(FWIW, I never had significantly more problems with Quantum hard drives than
with most others. I stay away from Maxtor (three dead 5.1GB drives in
almost as many months, plus numerous other problems since), and some of my
IBM drives have started acting up (only 75GXP & 60GXP models; the others
have been OK). Everything else has usually held up well enough. These
days, I'm mainly buying Western Digital xxxxJB drives. The 3-year warranty
is a Good Thing to have.
_/_ Scott Alfter (address in header doesn't receive mail)
/ v \ send mail to $firstname@$lastname.us
(IIGS( http://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
\_^_/ rm -rf /bin/laden >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Linux)
iD8DBQE/1qDOVgTKos01OwkRAuVrAJ4ssnRuHuTNhrAuMgot8kAJjuP27A Cfbl3u
BTf3/KWAozSEFnSCEYM2Lhg=
=bzq8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Posted by chrisv on December 10th, 2003
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 04:27:58 GMT, salfter@salfter.dyndns.org (Scott
Alfter) wrote:
Bah. Drives are so cheap now that the value of a long warrantee is
almost zilch. So your drive goes belly-up after 2 years? Well, then,
spend $70 and get a new one that's bigger and faster than the one you
had before. It'll be a nice upgrade.
- Posted by Cheah TE on December 10th, 2003
| I'm mainly buying Western Digital xxxxJB drives. The 3-year warranty
| is a Good Thing to have.
Agree. I've just bought a WD 400JB, I like its heat dissipation design
: interior ICs' heat are conducted to hdd's exterior, to travel into PC
casing. My Seagate ata66 & 33 hdd's ICs' heat just accumulate ( has
nowhere to go ).
- Posted by Rod Speed on December 10th, 2003
Michael Cecil <macecil@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:25detv8arurg45cinps2hur0t3tungsqsq@4ax.com...
Maybe. It depends on the premium you pay for that.
In theory, yes. In practice it isnt possible to design a modern drive
so it will survive the 1 year warranty period fine and not the 3 years.
- Posted by Stellijer on December 11th, 2003
I don't know about the MOST reliable but I've had some pretty frightening
experiences recently with Western Digital 40GB and 80GB drives.
They died utterly WITHOUT WARNING, and one died when it was less than 1 week old
after initially passing all diagnostics.
Cheah TE <none@spam.biz.my> wrote in message news:3fd2d43a_2@news.tm.net.my...