Tech Support > Computers & Technology > Video & DVD > Hmmm... DVD is only 540 horizontal resolution (according to the EIA)
Hmmm... DVD is only 540 horizontal resolution (according to the EIA)
Posted by SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com on January 31st, 2007


For comparison other standards are:
240 - VHS (ditto Betamax)
330 - NTSC broadcast
425 - laserdisc (ditto S-VHS)
540 - DVD

I was a bit surprised, but apparently the Electronics Industry
Association measures the resolution differently than one might
expect. They put a giant circle in the middle of the screen, count
the number of visible pixels across, and arrive at a number like "425
for laserdisc" or "540 for dvd". It seems counterintuitive, but
that's how it's done.

I imagine if the DVD is severely compressed, the quality would drop
much lower than 540 (just as a VHS tape recorded in super-slow mode is
only ~120 across). 540 is the ideal, not the norm.

Posted by Stuart Miller on January 31st, 2007



<SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1170274597.382084.36170@k78g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
First is the signal. I had understood NTSC to be 525 each way, (for a video
camera)
Second is the display - there are regions of the signal ( top & bottom)
which are not displayed on the screen


So what you actually see is less than what is recorded. The technical
sections of sites like digitalfaq explainm this properly.

Stuart




Posted by Andrew Rossmann on January 31st, 2007


In article <D_6wh.832427$5R2.679581@pd7urf3no>, stuart_miller@shaw.ca
says...
Don't confuse HORIZONTAL resolution with VERTICAL resolution.

525 is the VERTICAL resolution of NTSC. Of those 525, only 480 actually
carry picture information. The rest are for sync, closed captioning, and
other digital transmission features (parental control, XDS,
TVGuideOnScreen, timecode for VCR's, etc...)

The 240/330, etc mentioned above are rough HORIZONTAL resolutions.

For reference, the HD resolutions are:
1280(h)x720(v)
1920(h)x1080(v)

--
If there is a no_junk in my address, please REMOVE it before replying!
All junk mail senders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
law!!
http://home.att.net/~andyross

Posted by David on January 31st, 2007



"Andrew Rossmann" <andysnewsreply@no_junk.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.202aceb5f9bbf0eb989892@newsgroups.comcast .net...
expressed in pixels, but expressed in "lines of resolution per picture
height". This is the standard method for defining analog resolutions in the
4:3 format. To get to pixels (approximately), these numbers have to be
multiplied by 1.333.

David


Posted by Anim8rFSK on February 1st, 2007


In article <D_6wh.832427$5R2.679581@pd7urf3no>,
"Stuart Miller" <stuart_miller@shaw.ca> wrote:

Stuart, allow me to introduce you to Troy Heagy, performance troll and
the self styled "most annoying man on usenet"

Troy posts under at least half a dozen names (see below) and his game is
to create a thread that might otherwise be interesting, and introduce a
deliberate mistake into it, and watch it fall apart with people arguing
about his mistake instead the actual topic.

He's been busted in rec.arts.tv so many times that he's expanding his
net to other groups, like mostly sci-fi like Farscape, and technical
ones like these. But he sets the cross posts to rec.arts.tv to show
that he's still managing to annoy us here.

He'll now scream that we're haters, and are stalking him, etc., etc.,
etc., and probably threaten legal action, yadda yadda yadda.

Oh, and he sends death threats to people that expose him like this, and
then will claim they've been sending HIM death threats, and writing his
boss and trying to get him fired, blah blah blah.

Killfile Troy Heagy in all (s)he-its many incarnations now:
Troy.Heagy@gmail.com,videonovels@yahoo.com
videonovels2010@yahoo.com,telenovels...ddad@yahoo.com
**DON'T FORGET THE NEWEST ONE>>> SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com

Posted by Anim8rFSK on February 1st, 2007


In article <MPG.202aceb5f9bbf0eb989892@newsgroups.comcast.net >,
Andrew Rossmann <andysnewsreply@no_junk.comcast.net> wrote:

Andrew, allow me to introduce you to Troy Heagy, performance troll and
the self styled "most annoying man on usenet"

Troy posts under at least half a dozen names (see below) and his game is
to create a thread that might otherwise be interesting, and introduce a
deliberate mistake into it, and watch it fall apart with people arguing
about his mistake instead the actual topic.

He's been busted in rec.arts.tv so many times that he's expanding his
net to other groups, like mostly sci-fi like Farscape, and technical
ones like these. But he sets the cross posts to rec.arts.tv to show
that he's still managing to annoy us here.

He'll now scream that we're haters, and are stalking him, etc., etc.,
etc., and probably threaten legal action, yadda yadda yadda.

Oh, and he sends death threats to people that expose him like this, and
then will claim they've been sending HIM death threats, and writing his
boss and trying to get him fired, blah blah blah.

Killfile Troy Heagy in all (s)he-its many incarnations now:
Troy.Heagy@gmail.com,videonovels@yahoo.com
videonovels2010@yahoo.com,telenovels...ddad@yahoo.com
**DON'T FORGET THE NEWEST ONE>>> SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com

Posted by SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com on February 1st, 2007



Andrew Rossmann wrote:

Correction: 486.


Posted by SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com on February 1st, 2007



David wrote:
"pixels per picture height" would also be a valid expression.



440 - NTSC broadcast
565 - laserdisc (ditto S-VHS)
720 - DVD


Posted by SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com on February 1st, 2007


Anim8r is an internet stalker. He follows me around from forum to
forum. It was originally an annoyance, but now it's genuinely
starting to scare me. I may have to seek legal action.



Anim8rFSK wrote:

Posted by MassiveProng on February 1st, 2007


On 31 Jan 2007 20:30:29 -0800, SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com Gave us:

And you are a top posting Usenet retard.

Keep your horseshit out of alt.video.dvd

We don't need a fucked in the head seminar from a dope that doesn't
know hat we already know about video's history.

If you don't even know how to respond to a Usenet post right, you
don't deserve to be paid any attention.

You are a TOFU retard, at best.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting

Posted by Martin Heffels on February 1st, 2007


On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:40:45 -0800, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

And, keep it out of rec.video.desktop too.

Thanks! :-D
--

Posted by SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com on February 1st, 2007



MassiveProng wrote:

"Manners ease the stress of communal living, and mannerly behavior
recognizes the right of others to share communal space. Many of our
daily expressions of politeness reflect this function. Saying "excuse
me," for example, shows that you recognize that you have invaded
another's space, and regret the necessity of doing so.

"That manners matter is evidenced by the fact that large books have
been written on the subject, advice columns frequently deal with
questions of mannerly behavior, and that schools have existed for the
sole purpose of teaching manners." - Read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manners


Posted by Richard C. on February 1st, 2007


Ignore massiveidiot.
He is an angry 12 year old who cannot communicate without
12 year old swear words.
His home base in alt.video.dvd.
We apologize for and are embarrassed by him.

============================================
<SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1170334938.944019.184860@k78g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

Posted by Default User on February 1st, 2007


Richard C. wrote:

Ignore Troy aka SFTVRatings* aka many other aliases. He's a troll, he's
trolling your newsgroup. Really. Seriously.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Posted by Stuart Miller on February 1st, 2007



"Anim8rFSK" <ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ANIM8Rfsk-A865A2.18345731012007@news.phx.highwinds-media.com...
Thanks for the 'heads up' - I have read the rest of this thread now

Stuart



Posted by Anim8rFSK on February 1st, 2007


In article <CLpwh.846572$R63.601948@pd7urf1no>,
"Stuart Miller" <stuart_miller@shaw.ca> wrote:

Sure thing.

Posted by Rick Merrill on February 1st, 2007


Andrew Rossmann wrote:
Small nit: "only 480 actually carry picture information. The rest" are
for Vertical Retrace and get to carry CC, etc.


Posted by Rick Merrill on February 1st, 2007


SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com wrote:
Hang on, 'resolution' is the number of tiny dots while 'pixel' is the
smallest unit of, well, picture. On many displays the number of
phosphor dots is several times the number of pixels. Now on a 1080i
screen with HD TV they are about equal. Anyone have had data to clarify
this?

Posted by MassiveProng on February 2nd, 2007


On 1 Feb 2007 05:02:19 -0800, SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com Gave us:


You are invading MY space. So Fuck off.

That's all the manners a twit like you deserves. Learn to post
correctly, and you MIGHT climb a rung or two up on the ladder that
leads out of the shit barrel you have placed yourself into.

Posted by MassiveProng on February 2nd, 2007


On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 06:57:19 -0800, "Richard C." <post-age@spamcop.net>
Gave us:

You speak for no one except your own multiple fucktard
personalities, jack-ass.


Similar Posts