- New version of Kubrick's 'Shining' preview
- Posted by anthony on October 7th, 2005
The authoritative DVDBeaver review site has given its members a sneak
preview of the new version of Kubrick's 'Shining', which should be
hitting cinemas around mid-December. The Kubrick Estate has given
acclaimed director Ron Howard, who many people see as assuming
Kubrick's mantle, exclusive rights to revise this movie to make it more
truly accord with Kubrick's original vision, before the Hollywood
financiers forced major changes to it.
Here's the URL -- get ready to see Kubrick as never before.
www.ps260.com/molly/SHINING%20FINAL.mov
- Posted by shinner on October 7th, 2005
"anthony" <anthonyjhcnospam@netscape.net> wrote in
news:1128647837.166274.3210@g14g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com:
snoooze....why don't you just post that it was a class assignment to create
a new trailer for the movie instead of making up some BS story?
- Posted by GMAN on October 7th, 2005
In article <1128647837.166274.3210@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.c om>, "anthony" <anthonyjhcnospam@netscape.net> wrote:
- Posted by GMAN on October 7th, 2005
In article <1128647837.166274.3210@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.c om>, "anthony" <anthonyjhcnospam@netscape.net> wrote:
Apes alone?
- Posted by franky on October 7th, 2005
"GMAN" <glenzabr@xmission.com> wrote in message
news:di4ntn$nkl$3@news.xmission.com...
Because both of those movies were based on books, neither of
which were 'definitive' by any means?
- Posted by Derek Janssen on October 7th, 2005
anthony wrote:
0_o??
(Yeah, especially after "The Grinch" and "EdTV"...)
(And what's worse is, they were saying the *exact same thing* about
Spielberg and "A.I."?)
Derek Janssen (be very afraid)
djanss@charter.net
- Posted by Derek Janssen on October 7th, 2005
franky wrote:
....And, given the fact that NOBODY's caught on yet that the .mov's a
dopey gag-fakie, that should be a pretty clear indication of just how
many even bothered to click in the first place?
Derek Janssen (there's not getting the joke, and then there's just not
*caring*)
djanss@charter.net
- Posted by Bill on October 7th, 2005
GMAN
There is a made for TV version, which is available on DVD. It is a pale
imitation of the original.
Bill.
---------
GMAN wrote:
- Posted by shinner on October 7th, 2005
Derek Janssen <djanss@nospam.charter.net> wrote in
news:8Sm1f.700$Ue7.103@fe03.lga:
Ahem, not everyone....
- Posted by JK@work on October 7th, 2005
"Bill" <wjw32@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43463a4b$0$19776$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
If you're a big King fan you know that his books are so superior to any
film version that;s ever been made. Start and end the Shining with Jack's
being replaced by exactly who? He made that movie the cult classic it has
become.
--
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
http://www.sinrodstudios.com/
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories/
- Posted by Mark W on October 7th, 2005
"anthony" <anthonyjhcnospam@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128647837.166274.3210@g14g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
That's great! I can't wait to see Henry Winckler say, 'Gimme the bat, Wendy.
Gimme the goddamn bat.'
- Posted by NewcastleBoy on October 7th, 2005
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:09:16 GMT, "JK@work" <JKSinrod@verizon.net>
wrote:
James Mason was very scarey as the baddie in Salem's Lot... I really
liked this film...
- NewcastleBoy
- Posted by Covenant on October 7th, 2005
"franky" <dooby@msn.com.au> wrote in message
news:4345e7f9$0$19814$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
You dont think that the original Willy Wonka was *definitive* ??
--
Covenant
A Man With Far Too Much Time On His Hands
- Posted by Derek Janssen on October 8th, 2005
JK@work wrote:
<sigh>
All right.
That does it.
If you believed *that* mess (or didn't even bother to find out), then
you probably believe THIS mess, too--From the same "news source":
http://www.ps260.com/Trailer/westsid...iler_small.mov
....Let's watch the fun from the extremely gullible.
Derek Janssen (it's called COMEDY, people--It involves things that
*don't really happen*...)
djanss@charter.net
- Posted by Anthony Horan on October 8th, 2005
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:11:50 GMT, Covenant wrote:
Roald Dahl certainly didn't.
- Posted by NewcastleBoy on October 8th, 2005
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:27:07 +1000, Anthony Horan
<anthonyhoran@hotmail.com> wrote:
Roald Dahl was certainly different... I saw a theatrical version of
"Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" this year.. I didn't realise it
didn't have the zany musical score. Apparently, the show can't be
performed with music any more as it originally didn't have music,
which I find unbelievable, but it's true. It really loses its impact
without the music.
- NewcastleBoy
- Posted by NewcastleBoy on October 8th, 2005
On 6 Oct 2005 18:17:17 -0700, "anthony"
<anthonyjhcnospam@netscape.net> wrote:
Will the Kubrick films being released later onto DVD in their original
widescreen ratio or the butchered P/S ratios?
- NewcastleBoy
- Posted by Michael on October 8th, 2005
Kubrick wanted them released in open matte; not P&S, or widescreen. 4:3
isn't synonymous with P&S.
"NewcastleBoy" <newcastleboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4347add5.32146609@news.kooee.com.au...
- Posted by NewcastleBoy on October 8th, 2005
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 23:30:46 +1000, "Michael"
<quadhammerNO@SPICEDHAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
Regardless of technicalities, it still amounts to cinematic butchery
of the highest order 
NewcastleBoy
P.S Thanks for that explanation.. 
- Posted by Covenant on October 8th, 2005
"Anthony Horan" <anthonyhoran@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ug9ar309p7gr.1jukkmg9ntq9z$.dlg@40tude.net...
So?
;' )
--
Covenant
A Man With Far Too Much Time On His Hands
