Sherlock wrote:
I'm sure someone does.

"Stephen Barker" <sb@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:9TOZb.42$8t.72745@news.uswest.net...
truth is, the spammers wouldn't even know anyone had sent it. AV would
stop it and worse than that what if you get caught?
I'm sure there are better ways to get even with scumbags that spam.

"Stephen Barker" said in news:9TOZb.42$8t.72745@news.uswest.net:
You are a very bad Netizen for wanting to put the rest of us at risk to
satisfy your peurile vendetta. Even if you knew where Osama Bin Laden was
hiding and could get postal mail delivered to him, it would be illegal to
mail a live bomb through the postal mails in an attempt to target him since
the bomb could blow up anywhere along the way, like on the passenger
airplane carrying your package which accidentally kills a bunch of
innocents. Based on your own illogic and lack of netiquette, we should
apply the same action against you. You don't proliferate viruses through
the Internet for any reason unless you want to be classified amongst the
scum that profilerate viruses at the general populace. You cannot guarantee
what will happen with the virus and you cannot guarantee that it targets and
affects only the intended recipient.

We're supposed to believe you have the indiscriminate authority to perform
such an attack on anyone at your discretion regardless of the perile it
subjects the community. Police are not allowed to blast a crowd with
double-odd buckshot to nail just the one guy that robbed a store. By your
logic, that murderer that escapes the courts or gets released from prison
should get murdered, but then you become the murderer that should get
murdered. That rapist should get raped to teach him a lesson, so then you
become the rapist that needs to be taught a lesson. Sorry, but I don't
recognize your self-professed claim to authorize yourself as the Nazi Net
Police. Tell us what ISP you use and your account and we'll be sure to
notify them that you intend to spread viruses. Doesn't matter why you
intend to spread them, only that you intend to spread them. Your intended
action to spread a virus puts you into a class worse than spammers and
spyware authors.

--
__________________________________________________ __________
*** Post replies to newsgroup. E-mail is not accepted. ***
__________________________________________________ __________

Sherlock wrote:
Ask the spammers I'm sure they already have many that they
use to send spam.

--
E-Mail Sent to this address <BlackList@Griffin-Technologies.net>
will be added to the BlackLists.

"little johnny" <missb93@hotmail.com> wrote in news:103g96o58ff9ib8
@corp.supernews.com:

Please expound.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid

1. Turn off any AV programs you have running.
2. Down load and install Kazaa or K/lite.
3. Start down loading programs.
15 min. you'll have all you need.

"Han" <noone@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns949752819F2A4ikkezelf@199.45.49.11...

hmmmmm ...I have a full floppy full of old ones from back in early 90's, I used to test AV
progs with..
most than likely of no good after nearly a decade on a floppy...


"Stephen Barker" <sb@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:9TOZb.42$8t.72745@news.uswest.net...
| Sherlock wrote:
| > Does anybody know where I can download a good virus to send to a
| > couple spammers?
| >
| > Thank you.
|
| I'm sure someone does.
|
|

On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:06:26 -0700, "Stephen Barker"
<sb@nospam.invalid> wrote:

thing as a good virus; and that, even if there were, deliberately
sending it to anybody is even further on the wrong side of the
"criminality" line than sending spam.

I propose that OP should just let karma and nature take their course.
There is a strong presumed link between the latest e-mail viruses/
"trojan" software and spamming: recent reported events seem to show
that there is indeed an "after market" for the IP addresses of
"trojaned" PCs and that there have been arrests of people selling
them.

If these reports are accurate then (by law enforcement logic) the
people who buy these addresses are as guilty as the people who sell
them: from that point of view, "organised crime" is going to have a
strong interest in what happens next, and incidentally in what
information the sellers provide to the authorities to save themselves.

Also, logically, even the dumbest ISP has to realise that their lack
of action - in particular, not limiting the types of traffic their
customers with leased IPs are sending through them - is contributing
to criminal activity including spamming and the spread of viruses.
That puts moral pressure, if not legal pressure, on them to deal with
that problem. Once that snowball starts rolling downhill, we should
see a rapid differentiation between responsible ISPs and the rest, and
end up in a state where the responsible IPs refuse all traffic from
the rest. That is going to make life considerably more difficult for
the spamming fraternity.

As Churchill said "It is not the end; it is not the beginning of the
end; but it is the end of the beginning".

How I wish.
Please remove "nospam" from mailto address
when replying

"little johnny" <missb93@hotmail.com> wrote in news:103ir8lnibod985
@corp.supernews.com:

question, maybe I didn't phrase it right.


--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid

jest post ya address asshole.... we'll post ya heaps of viruses


"*Vanguard*" <no-email@no-spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:HIGdne59_5GKtqXd4p2dnA@comcast.com...

YOU ARE RIGHT DONT BE A SCUMM BAG TOO


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.725 / Virus Database: 480 - Release Date: 7/19/2004