- Philex Atomic Clock
- Posted by randau on June 29th, 2003
"Tony McCanless" <Tony@Mservers.net> wrote in message news:<e6OxJgdPDHA.704@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>...
Thanks Tony. I was looking at the NIST Internet Time Service web site
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/service/its.htm
just yesterday thinking that I might try its atomic clock if I get no
feedback on how to fix my Philex Atomic Clock (and it looks like I
won't).
I read somewhere on the NIST site something about the Internet time
servers sometimes changing location. And, they provide a place in
their software for upgrading the time server location. Do you know
about that?
Philex doesn't provide anything like that as far as I can tell. I
wonder if the time server Philex used in their software has changed
location and that's why I can no longer access it?
-randau
Oregon, USA
- Posted by VManes on June 30th, 2003
"randau" <spamjunkmail2002@yahoo.com> wrote
<snip>
I read somewhere on the NIST site something about the Internet time
servers sometimes changing location. And, they provide a place in
their software for upgrading the time server location. Do you know
about that?
<snip>
There is an "Update Servers" option, and there are 7 servers to choose from
right now.
Val
--
Bringing you BeadWizard Design Software
www.beadwizard.com
***************************
Practice safe eating -- always use condiments.
***************************
- Posted by randau on June 30th, 2003
Thanks Tony and Val. I'm convinced about switching to the NIST Atomic
clock. Sounds like it'd be a lot more reliable.
-randau
Oregon, USA
- Posted by Tony McCanless on June 30th, 2003
I've been using it for years, but found in this thread a newer version. It
works the same with a few additional features. It's freeware, no spyware,
and low resources to keep it active in the tray.
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/service/its.htm
Tony
"randau" <spamjunkmail2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8066f59b.0306301514.7930b089@posting.google.c om...
Thanks Tony and Val. I'm convinced about switching to the NIST Atomic
clock. Sounds like it'd be a lot more reliable.
-randau
Oregon, USA
- Posted by Dave Bowman on July 1st, 2003
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 23:50:30 GMT,"Tony McCanless" <Tony@Mservers.net>
penned this whopper in news:e6ePpJ2PDHA.2316@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:
Do be aware of the difference between Daytime protocol on port 13 and NTP
on port 37. the 2nd is way more accurate, but overkill for home users.
--
"To know, is to know that you know nothing.
That is the meaning of true knowledge."
Confucius (c. 551-479 B.C.) Chinese philosopher
Have a Nice Day,
Mike
To reply via email, use "reply button and remove ".invalid"
