Tech Support > Operating Systems > Windows NT > RPC server is unavailable
RPC server is unavailable
Posted by Carl Gross on February 16th, 2005


My NT 4.0 server (SP6a) is not retaining any printer settings and when I try
to re-install them, I get the:

"RPC server is unavailable".

I have replaced the Spoolss.exe and Spoolss.dll files but the problem
remains. When I look at the RPC services, they are still running and set to
automatic. If I try to re-apply the latest service pack (as the technet
article recommends) I will lose my system since so many hotfixes have been
installed since then (how do I know this? It happened on a BDC of mine).

Is there anything else that I can do to fix the problem?

Posted by John John on February 16th, 2005


Is the Spooler service started or set to "Automatic"? If not try
starting or setting it to auto.

John

Carl Gross wrote:

Posted by Carl Gross on February 16th, 2005


From what I can see, the service never stops. And it is always set to
automatic. So I can't see what other avaenue to go from.

"John John" wrote:

Posted by John John on February 16th, 2005


Any errors showing up in the event log?

John

Carl Gross wrote:

Posted by Carl Gross on February 17th, 2005


No. Just the aforementioned dialog that pops up on the screen.
"John John" <audetweld@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:eikJuUHFFHA.2756@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...


Posted by John John on February 17th, 2005


Hmmmm. Well, I don't really have any ideas or fixes to suggest. You
might get a clue here:

http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles...ArticleID=7324

Maybe completely removing the printer might help?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/135406/EN-US/

Other than that all avenues seem to lead to that dreaded reinstalling
the Service Pack.

John

Carl Gross wrote:


Posted by John John on February 17th, 2005


PS: Some print expert in the
news://msnews.microsoft.com:microsof...dowsnt.pr int group

might have a suggestion or fix to offer.

I googled this but didn't go thru the results.
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups...=2005&safe=off

John

John John wrote:



Similar Posts